In which scenario can a process server request the court to allow alternative service methods?

A process server can request the court to allow alternative service methods when the individual to be served is actively avoiding service. This situation often arises in cases where traditional service methods, such as personal delivery or mailing, have proven ineffective because the individual evades service attempts. Courts recognize that due process requires that a party receive notice of legal actions against them, and when someone is deliberately eluding service, alternative methods may be necessary to ensure that they are informed of the proceedings.

In such cases, a process server may propose alternate service methods such as serving the individual at a place where they are known to frequently visit, leaving documents with someone at their residence, or utilizing electronic means where permissible. These methods are utilized to fulfill the legal obligation of notifying the individual while acknowledging the challenges posed by their evasiveness.

The other scenarios do not justify a request for alternative service in the same manner. For instance, if a person lives in another state, there are established procedures for serving individuals out-of-state that do not necessitate alternative methods. Similarly, having a different address than what is listed typically also does not warrant alternative service, as processes exist to confirm and locate correct addresses. A poor understanding of the legal process by the server does not impact the need for alternative